VIEW from behind the plow

Kingfisher’s own Brian Walter has been on a mission to force Congresspersons to give up their pay if they don’t complete the No. 1 job their elected to do – enact a federal government budget annually.

But our “do-nothing Congress” – a term we fi rst heard from the late President Harry Truman – seems to be more interested in getting free TV time than taking care of real business.

Check the Justin Bogie column on the right side of this page for greater detail on the subject.

Why Is Whistle Blower’s Anonymity So Important?

Have you ever wondered why Rep. Adam Schiff is so protective of the identity of the supposed whistle blower who alerted Congressman Schiff, California Democrat, of that awful telephone call President Trump made to the Ukrainian president before notifying FBI about his suspicions of “wrongdoing?”

Byron York, writing in Townhall.com, suggest that if they make the “blower’s” identity offi cially public (rather than everyone knowing already he is a lefty activist determined to remove President Trump from office), the whole impeachment scam will blow up in their faces, much like the Mueller investigation.

Why?

Here’s what York said:

“Why are House Democrats stonewalling questions about the identity of the Trump-Ukraine whistleblower?

“Start by taking them at their word. Perhaps they really are concerned about the whistleblower’s personal safety. They also know that, beyond a limited prohibition applying only to the inspector general of the intelligence community, no law bars anyone -- in politics, media or anywhere else -- from revealing the whistleblower’s identity. So they worry.

“But there is more to the story. Should the whistleblower have connections to prominent Democrats, exposure of his identity could be embarrassing to the party. And perhaps most of all, reading through the impeachment inquiry depositions that have been released so far, it’s clear that cutting off questions that could possibly relate to the whistleblower has also allowed Democrats to shut off any look at how the Trump-Ukraine investigation started.

Who was involved? What actions did they take? Why did some government employees think President Trump’s July 25 call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy represented a lost opportunity, or poor judgment, while others thought it represented wrongdoing requiring congressional investigation?

“Democrats do not want the public to know. And that is a position familiar to anyone who has watched Washington for the last two years: The Democrats’ determination to cut off questions about the origins of the Trump-Ukraine investigation is strikingly similar to their determination to cut off questions about the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation. In both cases, they fought hard to keep secret the origins of investigations that have shaken the nation, deeply divided the electorate, and affected the future of the presidency.

“From their point of view, it makes sense. Democrats were rattled by Republican efforts to uncover the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. The Steele dossier, the use of spies and informants to target the Trump campaign, the Carter Page wiretap, the murky start to the Crossfi re Hurricane investigation -- Democrats resisted GOP attempts to reveal them all.

But in 2017 and 2018 Republicans controlled the House. Then-Chairman Devin Nunes used the power of the Intelligence Committee to unearth key parts of the story. Nunes’ efforts eventually led to a Justice Department inspector general investigation whose results, expected in coming weeks, could further damage the Democratic Trump-Russia storyline. And then there is the ongoing criminal investigation led by U.S. Attorney John Durham.

But Democrats now control the House. As they lead the Trump-Ukraine impeachment inquiry, current Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and other Democrats are applying the lesson learned from Trump-Russia: Do not allow inquiry into the origins of the investigation.

Whistle Blower Created the Master Plan

“The problem is, the whistleblower remains an important part of the story. His carefully crafted Aug. 12 complaint created the template that Democrats have followed in the impeachment campaign. In public hearings, Democrats have praised the whistleblower’s action for starting the whole process. And it’s an incredibly important process – what matter could be more weighty than possible removing the president of the United States? But the public does not get to learn how it began.”

Perhaps what the left’s biggest mistake is thinking that a majority of Americans care about their nefarious inquiry (whatever the term is today for the faux TV show).

It is obvious that the Democrat leaders are determined to be their own inquisitors, making it easier to reach the conclusion they want to present to the public.

It should be very interesting when the things Schiff doesn’t want known bubble to the surface.

At this point the intelligent public is bored, bored, bored.